Sunday, July 31, 2016
Want to Be Impressive at the Podium? Watch These 3 TED Talks Now
Hacker Explains Why OurMine Took Over 'Pokmon GO' Creator's Social Media Accounts
How The Mobile Phone Is Enabling A New Social Enterprise Economy
Four Interview Questions To Help You Hire People With Grit
The Wall Street Journal: Jack Ma's firm among Chinese consortium making $4.4. billion foray into online gambling
From Russia, With Love? Trump, Putin And The DNC Email Leak
5 MM: Carrots, Sticks and Wellness
Tags: culture, Game Changers, wellness
The post 5 MM: Carrots, Sticks and Wellness appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Saturday, July 30, 2016
"I See You, You See Me": What Space Means for the Surge of Intelligence
Flipping A PR Flop: These 4 Founders Show How It's Done
Deep Dive: Two veteran stock pickers win by going where others see 'fear or disinterest'
5 Tips for Managing Your Kids At Work Without Treating Them Like Children
Sorry Google And Tesla, FiveAI Will Have The Best Driverless Car
Ex-FBI Cyber Sleuth: DNC And Clinton Campaign Hack Part Of A Pattern
Friday, July 29, 2016
Women In Tech Must Continually Challenge The Status Quo, Says This CEO
We're Headed for Overtime
If you're an employer with a bunch of workers making just under $50,000 a year, prepare to work overtime to get your company ready for the new overtime rules.
Under this new ruling, which was announced May 18 and is set to go into effect Dec. 1, overtime pay will automatically be extended to more than 4 million Americans in its first year in effect, according to the U.S. Labor Department. All employees earning less than $47,476 per year and working more than 40 hours per week will be considered eligible for time-and-a-half overtime pay. This new standard is set at the 40th percentile of earnings and will be automatically reapplied every three years.
With that said, are there any companies that won't be significantly affected by these changes? Brian Baxter, vice president of human resources at Modere, a personal care company based in Springville, Utah, said, “Organizations with operations in states with higher costs of living [and] with generally higher wages will not have many adjustments to make.”
Still, not all companies will be so fortunate.
Even with these changes being finalized, the future of this overtime regulation is still daunting, and its effect on the workforce is uncertain. Scott Bales, senior director of customer success at Replicon Inc., a time-keeping software company based in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, which provides services to many large U.S. companies, has examined the new overtime rule.
Replicon data found that an employee from a small to medium-size business works on average 25.5 hours more overtime per year than a worker from a large employer. For a business with employees who regularly log overtime hours, Bales suggests examining the type of work that is being completed during these extra hours. For instance, “If someone is consistently working over 40 hours but is spending a lot of time on administrative tasks, this [could] be delegated to another person to not only reduce costs but also support that person in focusing on more strategic and career development opportunities,” Bales said.
Baxter shares a similar mindset. He said, “The biggest concern is cost.” Before the new overtime rules go into effect, “a detailed analysis will have to be done to determine if it's better to simply move salaries above the new threshold or to move them to nonexempt and bite the bullet of overtime pay.”
While re-examining the financial effect that the overtime rule will have on salaries and budgets is important, it is not the only factor that employers should consider when preparing for changes in their company. According to Bales, employers need to look at the overtime rule from business operations, workforce management and legal standpoints, and employers should also be conscious of how changes might affect employee morale.
Even after examining these factors, many employers will still be left wondering how exactly they can prepare their business for the rapidly approaching overtime rule. Bales said employers have
four options.
The first option requires employers to reclassify jobs as nonexempt and pay for excess overtime hours worked, and this, Bales said, is the easiest of the four options.
The second option is employers can reclassify jobs as nonexempt, and by defining what constitutes overtime hours, companies can maintain a tighter grip on costs. However, Bales warned: “This can be difficult to curtail, and managers will also need to be more proactive and vigilant in monitoring hours.”
The third option is to classify jobs as exempt and raise employees' pay to meet the new salary threshold.
The fourth option, Bales said, is one “role could be divided into two jobs to attempt to reduce overtime payments. Depending on the role, it may make sense to delegate tasks and look at how this could also support greater efficiencies.”
Even with an upcoming presidential election, the new overtime rule isn't likely going anywhere. Bales said, “The overtime rule is an executive rule change, not legislation. If the next president, however, is against the new rule, it can be reversed - although this will take a long time
to do.”
Whether an employer supports or opposes the new overtime rule, it sounds like their best option is just to get used to it - and start putting in some overtime to get ready for it.
AnnMarie Kuzel is an editorial intern at Workforce. Comment below or email editor@workforce.com.
Tags: overtime, US Labor Department, wages
The post We're Headed for Overtime appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
The Wall Street Journal: Facebook says it may owe up to $5 billion in taxes
How To Know What Your Brand Experience Is Worth
OSHA Says 'Negative' to Post-Accident Testing
Buried in OSHA's impending final rule on electronic reporting of workplace injuries and illnesses is this little nugget. OSHA believes that you violate the law if you require an employee to take a post-accident drug test. Let me repeat. According to OSHA, you violate the law if you automatically drug test any employee after an on-the-job accident.
Allow me to pause while this sinks in.
While this prohibition doesn't appear in the the actual text of the final rule, it does prominently appear in OSHA's interpretation of the provision which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who reporting a work-related injury or illness:
OSHA believes the evidence in the rulemaking record shows that blanket post-injury drug testing policies deter proper reporting.… [T]his final rule does not ban drug testing of employees. However, the final rule does prohibit employers from using drug testing (or the threat of drug testing) as a form of adverse action against employees who report injuries or illnesses. To strike the appropriate balance here, drug testing policies should limit post-incident testing to situations in which employee drug use is likely to have contributed to the incident, and for which the drug test can accurately identify impairment caused by drug use.… Employers need not specifically suspect drug use before testing, but there should be a reasonable possibility that drug use by the reporting employee was a contributing factor to the reported injury or illness in order for an employer to require drug testing.
“What about workers' compensation laws,” you say? “State law requires post-accident testing. What gives?” OSHA hears your cries, and has an answer for you:
A few commenters also raised the concern that the final rule will conflict with drug testing requirements contained in workers' compensation laws. This concern is unwarranted. If an employer conducts drug testing to comply with the requirements of a state or federal law or regulation, the employer's motive would not be retaliatory and the final rule would not prohibit such testing. This is doubly true because Section 4(b)(4) of the Act prohibits OSHA from superseding or affecting workers' compensation laws.
Make no mistake, this interpretation is huge for employers. As a result of this new reporting standard, employer policies that require post-accident drug testing will face scrutiny by OSHA, and OSHA will cite you for any policy that mandates post-accident testing without consideration of the specific facts and circumstances of the injury. Further, OSHA will deem retaliatory any employer discipline for a failed or refused post-accident test unless the drug use is likely to have contributed to the accident and for which the test can accurately identify pre-accident drug-related impairment. That's a high bar for employers to clear.
This rule was to take effect on Aug. 10, but OSHA has stated that it is delaying enforcement until Nov. 1. If you have a drug testing policy or otherwise engage post-accident testing in your workplace, now is the time to review your policies and practices with your employment counsel. This issue is very much on OSHA's radar, which means it must be on your radar also.
Jon Hyman is a partner at Meyers, Roman, Friedberg & Lewis in Cleveland. To comment, email editors@workforce.com. Follow Hyman's blog at Workforce.com/PracticalEmployer.
Tags: drug testing, OSHA
The post OSHA Says 'Negative' to Post-Accident Testing appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Meet The 'Fishmonger' Behind America's Top Celebrity Chefs
Infosec Experts Weigh In On Trump's Call For Russians To Hack Clinton Email
Wednesday, July 27, 2016
Whole Foods Shares Drop on Lower Earnings, Sales
Marketing 101 -- Make Your Customer Service Team An Asset Not A Necessary Evil
Cisco Live 2016: Analyst Take On Important Security And Networking Announcements You May Have Missed
Doughnuts and Dialogue: Something to Chew on to Communicate Benefits
It all started with a doughnut.
For PR firm Walker Sands Communications, that round, sometimes frosted dessert didn't just pack a lot of cream - it packed a lot of punch as well.
Mike Santoro, president of Walker Sands, wanted to learn how news traveled across his company. He turned his head toward the regular internal employee newsletter, wondering if it was an effective communication tool.
“When you're a small company, it's easy to spread the word. You stand up in the middle of the floor and yell, 'Attention!' As we've grown, it's definitely been more challenging,” Santoro said. “We wanted to do an actual experiment to find out how they [employees] behave.”
Then, he thought about that popular breakfast treat. Santoro said he thought to himself, “What can we do with doughnuts?”
Besides making Homer Simpson the happiest man in the world?
At 9 a.m. on a Friday, two different versions of the same e-newsletter went out. One read, “Donuts in the Conference Room” at the top; the second placed the same phrase toward the bottom. By 10:30 a.m., 91 percent of the newsletter's recipients were aware of the information but in a way that interested Santoro. Nearly half of the employees in the conference room had heard about the pastries from a source other than the newsletter. Santoro learned that the office newsletter is only slightly better than word of mouth - and that word of mouth only travels so far.
Walker Sands' recent study raises an interesting question about effective perks and benefits communication strategies, which can be just as tricky and sticky as the icing on that pastry. How can employers effectively spread the word?
“Today's employee and the ways of communicating have changed,” Santoro said. “It used to be, you could do direct mail, face-to-face. You could do phone calls. Now, people are consuming information” through many different kinds of outlets.
“As much as you can, communicate with pictures and video,” Santoro said. “That's really important to be able to tell that story.”
Social media sites, Santoro said, are great methods of doing just that.
“Our own employees tend to be younger people,” he said, “who tend to communicate across Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram.”
But just because the digital age provides more communication tools, Santoro said the traditional in-person meetings should not be overlooked.
“We have quarterly meetings; we have monthly town halls where we gather everyone in the company together and tell them: 'This is what's most important for the month.' Then you have these other secondary mechanisms, like the newsletter and active social channel,” Santoro said.
But communicating those perks and benefits doesn't always have to revolve around “Who's bringing the doughnuts?” David Daskal has also seen some unique strategies as director of business development at The Jellyvision Lab Inc., a business that creates interactive software to help employees learn about workplace benefits.
“Being human means you also have the freedom to have a little fun,” Daskal said. “Engaging posters and fliers in the break room, a raffle for everyone who participates in a benefits webinar. We've even worked with HR teams who have dressed up in costumes to help promote open enrollment.”
Sarah Foster is an editorial intern at Workforce. Comment below or email at editors@workforce.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.
Tags: benefits communication, doughnuts, perks, Walker Sands
The post Doughnuts and Dialogue: Something to Chew on to Communicate Benefits appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Motorola Declines To Commit To Monthly Security Updates For Android
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
13 of the most successful Teen Social Media Influencers you need to know
BlackBerry's Smartphone Sacrifice Is All About Security
Beat the System: U.S. presidential election gets its own spy-novel subplot
China Beginning To Sound Like North Korea
5MM: Robots and Jobs
Tags: ACA, Affordable Care Act, automation, Cadillac tax, jobs, robots, technology
The post 5MM: Robots and Jobs appeared first on Workforce Magazine.