Friday, September 30, 2016
Getting Real About Getting To Mars
Chip Cards Are Still Frustrating And Confusing People
Hillary Clinton Will Kill With Kindness ... And Drones
6 Scotch Whisky Microdistilleries That Will Change the Industry (Part 1)
Workday Rising - My First HR Conference
I attended the Workday Rising conference in Chicago, my first major HR conference.
Almost 7,000 people attended. HR software company Workday released information about new products, features and partnerships. We're going to take a break from my normal beat of wellness for a moment and consider two other workplace issues that I encountered at the conference: learning and recruiting.
James Cross, director of product strategy at Workday, spoke of the increasing relevance of video in today's workplace learning. For example, Workday is incorporating video learning on its platform, and users can create their own content from their own phones. They can post it in seconds onto the platform for learners to watch.
The rising importance of video is as significant as the rise of mobile a few years back, Cross said, paraphrasing Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg who saw the increasing importance of video and developed Facebook Live.
Video has always been powerful, Cross said, but it's only recently that it's been at the reach of your average person or consumer. And because people consume so much video content in their everyday lives, they want their learning content to look the same.
But this explosion of video in the consumer world - think YouTube - hasn't been as quick to spread to the enterprise market, which is why Workday is investing so much time in developing a simple, effective video learning system.
The other gem of this conversation: Cross started out his career as a high school music teacher, which is when he realized how video could have such a strong impact on learning. At the time though, video was difficult enough that other teachers didn't necessarily use it in the same way. Now in 2016, video is so simple anyone with a phone can create video content.
My conversation with Cross was valuable, first of all, because I used to write mostly for our sister magazine Chief Learning Officer about learning and development. Now, on my benefits and wellness beat I wonder: If the rise of video is such a noteworthy development, how might video be incorporated in wellness programs, benefits communications and the like? The rise of telemedicine, for example, is related to the increased availability of video chatting and the convenience of speaking to a doctor or counselor via a phone or computer. Increased access to video and increased simplicity in creating video content is something that could impact other parts of a business outside of learning.
I also spoke with Kelly Swanson, director of HR operations at FICO, the leading data analytics software company. The company is now using Workday's platform and especially found value in the recruiting capabilities. What was especially interesting about this conversation was how FICO used very focused data to recruit a particular type of person: students.
Whereas before their internship program was not robust, now internships are key to FICO's growth strategy. The company looks at developing interns for full time positions, Swanson said. They use this recruiting system, which allows them to focus the search and find the right people who are interested in working in the industry.
Also key to this conversation: the unification of HR processes. For example, FICO uses Workday, which unifies everything from recruiting to onboarding to compensation under one platform and which does so across all of FICO's 38 global offices.
Simplifying HR processes is something I hear a lot about now, and as I head to my next HR conference next week, I'll be sure to look out for more about it.
Andie Burjek is a Workforce associate editor. Comment below, or email at aburjek@humancapitalmedia.com. Follow Workforce on Twitter at @workforcenews.
Tags: Facebook Live, learning, recruiting, Workday Rising
The post Workday Rising - My First HR Conference appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Thursday, September 29, 2016
MarketWatch First Take: Tech must look to past to protect the future from an artificial intelligence apocalypse
North Korea Has A Best Friend Forever, U.S. Sanctions Show
How to Actually Execute Your Business Strategy
Key Words: What Twitter can learn from the Green Bay Packers
Apple's Messages Metadata Could Be Valuable To Law Enforcement
Will OSHA's New Whistleblower Rules Invalidate Your Settlement Agreement?
When an employer presents an agreement to an employee ancillary to the separation of that employee's employment, or settles a claim asserted by an employee, part of the bargain for which the employer is paying is finality. Yet, over the past couple of years, the federal government has made this finality harder and harder to achieve.
Confidentiality, non-disparagement, and other “gag” provisions in employee separation and settlement agreements have been under attack by various federal agencies, including the EEOC and the NLRB. Now, OSHA also has joined the fray.
Last month, OSHA published new guidance, part of its revisions to its Whistleblower Investigations Manual, which seeks to free employees to report safety and other violations to the government.
As part of OSHA's administration of myriad whistleblower protection statutes, OSHA reviews settlement agreements between complainants and their employers. OSHA only approves such agreements that it deems to be fair, adequate, reasonable, and in the public interest, and if the employee's consent was knowing and voluntary. If OSHA encounters a provision that prohibits, restricts, or otherwise discourages an employee from participating in protected activity, it will reject the agreement until the employer removed the allegedly offensive provision.
OSHA's updated guidance clarifies the criteria OSHA will use to evaluate whether an agreement impermissibly restricts or discourages protected activity.
Moving forward, OSHA will not approve any of the following “gag” provisions:
- A provision that restricts the employee's ability to provide information to the government, participate in investigations, file a complaint, or testify in proceedings based on an employer's past or future conduct. For example, OSHA will not approve a provision that restricts an employee's right to provide information to the government related to an occupational injury or exposure.
- A provision that requires an employee to notify his or her employer before filing a complaint or voluntarily communicating with the government regarding the employer's past or future conduct.
- A provision that requires an employee to affirm that he or she has not previously provided information to the government or engaged in other protected activity, or to disclaim any knowledge that the employer has violated the law.
- A provision that requires an employee to waive his or her right to receive a monetary award from a government-administered whistleblower award program for providing information to a government agency, or that requires an employee to remit any portion of such an award to the employer.
So, what is an employer to do? How can an employer secure as much finality as possible while satisfying OSHA's stance against gag provisions? OSHA suggests prominently inserting the following clause into the agreement:
Nothing in this Agreement is intended to or shall prevent, impede or interfere with complainant's non-waivable right, without prior notice to Respondent, to provide information to the government, participate in investigations, file a complaint, testify in proceedings regarding Respondent's past or future conduct, or engage in any future activities protected under the whistleblower statutes administered by OSHA, or to receive and fully retain a monetary award from a government-administered whistleblower award program for providing information directly to a government agency.
Tags: NLRB, OSHA, whistleblower
The post Will OSHA's New Whistleblower Rules Invalidate Your Settlement Agreement? appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
Like Old HP, BlackBerry Is Giving Its Advantage Away . . . Piece By Piece
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Not All Captive Insurance Risk Pools Are Created Equally
Apttus valued at more than $1.3 billion, eyes IPO next
Amy Schumer And Justin Bieber Ranked Highest In Annual Most Dangerous Celebrities Study
The Most Expensive Bottle of Orange Juice Ever
A federal jury has found in favor of the EEOC in a federal disability discrimination lawsuit against the retail giant Dollar General…. EEOC had charged Dollar General with firing a cashier at its Maryville, Tenn., store because of her need to treat her diabetes.
According to EEOC's suit, the cashier, an insulin-dependent diabetic, told her supervisor she was a diabetic and requested on several occasions that her supervisor allow her to keep juice near the register to prevent a hypoglycemic attack. At trial, the cashier testified that her supervisor told her that Dollar General did not allow employees to keep food or drink near the register. …
While alone in the store one day, the cashier drank orange juice prior to purchase, in violation of Dollar General's “grazing” policy, in response to symptoms of a hypoglycemic attack and to protect the store. As soon as the medical emergency passed, the cashier paid for the bottle of orange juice that cost $1.69 plus tax. Later, the district manager and loss prevention manager appeared in the store to address inventory shrinkage and fired the cashier after she admitted to drinking orange juice prior to purchase. The store fired the employee even though it knew she drank the orange juice because of her diabetes and that she had requested to keep juice near the register. …
The jury returned a verdict … for EEOC and the victim, awarding the former cashier $27,565 in back pay and $250,000 in compensatory damages.
Tags: Dollar General, EEOC, orange juice
The post The Most Expensive Bottle of Orange Juice Ever appeared first on Workforce Magazine.
How to Identify Best Practices from Other Organizations that Will Work for Your Company
Take A Look At The New All-Luxury Commercial Flight ($50,000 A Seat)
Netflix is pouring money into some of TV's most expensive shows
How This CEO Went From Shutdown, To Shake Up, To Nearing IPO
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
Framework Of Trust Between Founder & VC
Why Great Content Marketing Is About Creating Successful Customers
Can Taiwan Come Back As Asia's Silicon Valley?
Why Trump Is Right About China
17 Arnold Palmer Quotes that Inspire Success
Why This Man's Inspiring Story Will Make You Want to Be a Better Leader
Asian FinTech Sandboxes -- Can They Work And Do We Need Them?
How Beijing Can Gracefully Win The South China Sea Dispute
Online Advertising In China Continues To Generate Public Concern And Police Action
7 Dangerous Myths About Emotional Intelligence
Remembering Shimon Peres: 13 Inspirational Quotes
Four things to know before Nutanix goes public
Germany Orders Facebook To Stop Collecting WhatsApp User Data
Here It Is: Elon Musk's Master Plan to Start a Colony on Mars
Monday, September 26, 2016
The Wall Street Journal: Labor Dept. sues Palantir, alleging discriminatory hiring
Korean Mayor Crusades Against Samsung, Hyundai In Bid To Boost Country's SME
Forget About Law and Ethics -- Is Hacking Back Even Effective?
Taking a Pass on Fantasy Football to Geek Out on Clinton and Trump
I have Drew Brees and Mark Ingram going tonight in my fantasy football league, and if they do anything at all I'm looking at topping KevinTheDude to start the season 3-0.
Not bad for a rookie in this fantasy thing if I do say so myself. It's fresh and new, and, you'd think that I would be riveted to Falcons vs. Saints on Monday Night Football tonight.
But Brees and Ingram will have to toss and tote the rock without me. Instead I'll be tuning in tonight's initial Clinton-Trump presidential debate, largely because I geek out way more on politics than following pro football in an entirely new and somewhat perverted way.
I just saw that ahead of tonight's Clinton-Trump gabfest, stalwart HR association WorldatWork sent an open letter to both campaigns outlining needed policy changes regarding total rewards.
Read: “Clinton Vs. Trump: The Workforce Winner Is … ”
WorldatWork's letter is timely, extremely relevant to employer concerns and addresses crucial workplace issues that unfortunately have taken a backseat to the bloviating that's been exhaled from both camps.
Here are the points made by the folks at WorldatWork:
Compensation: Protecting Millions of Exempt Employees. WorldatWork supports repealing the automatic salary test indexing requirements included in the U.S. Department of Labor's new Fair Labor Standards Act overtime-pay regulations. According to our analyses, the number of employees who are currently exempt from the regulations will drop dramatically at the first indexing update just three years away, sending this long-established professional and managerial category to near extinction during the next 15 years. Millions of midlevel employees could lose their benefits and workplace flexibility options. This new requirement has the potential to radically change the structure of the American workforce and must be repealed. WorldatWork supports all legislative efforts to address this indexing threat to the nation's exempt-employee classification.
Compensation: Supporting a Modern Mobile Workplace. We urge you to join WorldatWork and support legislation that would help simplify a patchwork of complicated nonresident state income-tax laws that are making administrative burdens even worse on employers and employees who travel for business purposes outside of their states. We support the Mobile Workforce State Income Tax Simplification Act (S.B. 386/H.R. 2315) because it provides consistency for reporting and withholding across the 50 states and reduces the administrative burden on everyone. Currently, each state has different tax filing requirements for individuals that travel to the state for business purposes, making a federal solution the only realistic option.
Protecting Employer-Sponsored Health Care Benefits: The 40 percent excise tax on employer-sponsored health care plans, or the “Cadillac tax,” is a ticking time bomb for employers. While Congress sensibly delayed the tax's full impact until 2020, the tax needs to be abolished outright. This destructive tax, part of the landmark Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, was meant to only target a small percentage of extravagant health care plans. But the tax is now expected to hit millions more Americans and their families' health care plans. The threat of this tax is already forcing employers to shift more costs to employees who are in-turn incurring higher out-of-pocket expenses. Several pieces of bipartisan legislation accomplish this repeal, each earning WorldatWork's support. WorldatWork is fully committed to the Alliance to Fight the 40's efforts to repeal this tax.
Child Care and Dependent Care Programs: Expanding Access for More Employees. A candidate's 2016 election platform should recognize modern workplace environments and help employers establish affordable child care and dependent-care programs for their employees. There are a number of easy solutions that a federal candidate can support, such as changing obsolete definitions of eligibility to include dependents and care of elders. We also strongly encourage you to back increasing the 30-year-old limit of $5,000 for dependent-care flexible savings accounts. Significantly increasing this limit will help families facing costly yearly expenses for daycare for their children, help for special needs children or elder care for their parents.
Executive Compensation: Seeking Reporting Accuracy and Fairness. Compensation professionals are seeking a repeal of the CEO pay-ratio requirement found in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Compensation experts are calling this requirement unworkable and extraordinarily expensive, and believe it will not result in any meaningful benefit for shareholders and investors. WorldatWork supports two bills (S.B. 1722/H.R. 414) repealing the law's requirement to produce this inaccurate median employee statistic.
Given that tonight's debate topics include health care, the economy and trade, it seems likely that Clinton and Trump will offer some insight into their policies on these topics. But like Brees, Ingram and Monday Night Football for me, I have a sneaking suspicion that workplace issues will take a backseat to hot-button debate topics like domestic terrorism, national security and immigration.
Good for WorldatWork to put these crucial workplace issues before the candidates. And it's worth asking: Do you think they're listening?
Rick Bell is the editorial director for Workforce. Comment below or email rbell@workforce.com.
Tags: Clinton vs. Trump, fantasy football, geek, Saints vs. Falcons, WorldatWork
The post Taking a Pass on Fantasy Football to Geek Out on Clinton and Trump appeared first on Workforce Magazine.